![]() |
ERDDAP
Easier access to scientific data |
Brought to you by NOAA NMFS SWFSC ERD |
griddap | Subset | tabledap | Make A Graph | wms | files | Title | Summary | FGDC | ISO 19115 | Info | Background Info | RSS | Institution | Dataset ID | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinBroods.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinBroods | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinBroods.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinBroods/ | Adelie penguin 1:2 chick nest ratio, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin 1:2 chick nest ratio, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nThe PAL study region includes five main islands on which Adélie penguin colonies have historically occurred, and typically during the first week of January when chicks are in the guard stage (thus visible because they are no longer being brooded), these colonies are censused to determine the ratio of 1-chick to 2-chick nests. This census is restricted to nests that are no more than one meter in from the colony perimeter, and therefore tend to be more vulnerable to predation and other factors such as snow deposition that tend to affect the more marginal sectors of the colonies. The 1:2 chick ratio is thus highly sensitive to perturbations that are not necessarily evident in more optimal breeding habitats, and has provided important insights on the effects that breeding landscape quality has on reproductive success. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\n... (6 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinBroods/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinBroods.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinBroods&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinBroods | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinCensus.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinCensus | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinCensus.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinCensus/ | Adelie penguin area-wide breeding population census, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin area-wide breeding population census, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nThe PAL study region includes five main islands on which Adélie penguin colonies have historically occurred. These are censused synoptically once a year to determine the overall size of the breeding population. The optimal census date may vary by a few days each season, but ultimately tries to capture the week following peak egg laying when the total number of breeding pairs reaches a maximum. The timing of this census is assisted by the REPRO and HUMPOP data, which provide a daily to weekly rate of change in breeding adult population numbers as new nests are initiated. This census is useful for a number of assessments, one of the most critical being that it directly reflects the effects of environmental variability on adult overwinter survival.\\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (Date GMT, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nisland_name (Island)\ncolony_code (Colony)\nnum_breeding_pairs (Breeding Pairs)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinCensus/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinCensus.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinCensus&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinCensus | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland/ | Adelie penguin breeding population arrival chronology on Humble Island, 1991, present.\\t | Adelie penguin breeding population arrival chronology on Humble Island, 1991 - present.\\t. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nThe arrival chronology of adult Adélie penguins on Humble Island is documented annually through island-wide censuses performed as ice and weather conditions permit. Recorded data (numbers of adults present) provide a measure of the number of adults arriving daily at the breeding colonies, a metric that is sensitive to environmental conditions such as sea ice extent during late winter and early spring. These data are also used in combination with other metrics to determine the optimal window for other, more extensive area-wide breeding population censuses (see CENSUS). \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (Date GMT, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nisland_name (Island)\ncolony_code (Colony)\nnum_breeding_pairs (Adults)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinPopulationonHumbleIsland | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights/ | Adelie penguin chick fledging weights, 1991, present.\\t | Adelie penguin chick fledging weights, 1991 - present.\\t. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nAdélie penguin chick fledging weights are obtained every two days (or as ice and weather conditions permit) at three beaches on Humble Island beginning when the first fledglings appear on any one of these beaches, and continuing until the last fledglings depart. These data are generally collected during the first three weeks of February by first censusing the total number of chicks present on each beach, and then sub-sampling 30% of the censused population. The metric of interest is the weight (in grams) of individual chicks, which is an important predictor of overwinter survival and thus future recruitment into the population as breeding adults. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (Date GMT, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nisland_name (Island)\ncolony_code (Colony)\nband_number\nweight (gram)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinFledglingWeights | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts/ | Adelie penguin colony-specific chick production, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin colony-specific chick production, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nThe PAL study region includes five main islands on which Adélie penguin colonies have historically occurred. These are censused synoptically once a year to determine the total number of chicks produced in the area. The optimal date for this census may vary by a few days each season, but ultimately tries to capture the week following the time when approximately 2/3 of the chicks have crèched. The timing of this census is assisted by the REPRO data, which provide a daily to weekly rate of change in the number of crèched chicks. Because the colonies used in this area-wide census are the same as those used to determine the overall annual breeding population, one of the key metrics obtained is an integrated number of breeding success (chicks crèched/breeding pair). These data have provided valuable insights into the marine and terrestrial factors that influence Adélie penguin mean population fitness. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\n... (6 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinAdultandChickCounts | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietFish.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietFish | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietFish.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinDietFish/ | Adelie penguin diet composition, fish species and numbers, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin diet composition, fish species and numbers, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\n\\nFish occur frequently in Adélie penguin diets but rarely as whole specimens, hence recording their presence in sorted subsamples (see DIET) is generally limited to noting the incidence of skin, flesh, bones, eyes and especially otoliths. With the exception of otoliths, the weights of these items are obtained if warranted by the sample size. Otoliths can be used to identify individual fish species, and in combination with regression equations based on otolith length and width, can also be used to reconstitute fish length and mass. However, because the expertise needed to identify fish from otoliths does not exist within the PAL program, otolith identification is performed by off-site experts as time and funding allow. This results in long lags between the time otoliths are collected and integrated with the appropriate databases, meaning that understanding the role of fish in Adélie penguin diets still remains a longer-term objective of PAL. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\n... (12 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinDietFish/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinDietFish.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinDietFish&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinDietFish | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba/ | Adelie penguin diet composition, krill size-frequency distribution, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin diet composition, krill size-frequency distribution, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nThree species of krill occur in Adélie penguin diet samples, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), crystal krill (E. crystallorophias) and Thysanoessa macrura (no common name), but beyond obtaining whole subsample weights following sorting (see DIET), only E. superba is subjected to further analysis. In this case, the original subsample from each individual penguin is searched with the objective of obtaining a minimum of 50 whole krill that when measured (in millimeters) provide an index of within and between season variability in population size-frequency distributions. These data have provided critical insights into a number of ecological processes, including in particular how sea ice affects krill recruitment and, in turn, how krill recruitment impacts Adélie penguin foraging efforts. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\n... (12 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinDietEuphausiasuberba | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDiet | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDiet.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinDiet/ | Adelie penguin diet composition, preliminary analyses of whole lavaged samples, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin diet composition, preliminary analyses of whole lavaged samples, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nAdélie penguin diet samples obtained in the field (see HEADER) are initially drained and weighed and returned to laboratories for further processing. This includes resuspension of the samples in fresh water to release fish otoliths, squid beaks and other prey hard parts, and then draining to a consistency that facilitates separating the diet samples into subsamples of primary and secondary prey components. Primary prey components include krill and fish, and secondary prey components include octopus, squid amphipods, mysid shrimp, limpets and small clams. Each prey component is weighed (total weight) and, if possible, sorted according to species for further analyses. Variability in diets within and between seasons is strongly linked to variability in the marine environment such as the presence or absence of sea ice and the timing and persistence of phytoplankton blooms, and thus affects a host of Adélie penguin life history parameters. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\n... (9 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinDiet/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinDiet.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinDiet&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinDiet | |||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba/ | Adelie penguin diet composition, secondary prey items, 1991, present.\\t | Adelie penguin diet composition, secondary prey items, 1991 - present.\\t. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nBesides krill and fish, a number of secondary prey items (see DIET) can be found in Adélie penguin diets, including octopus, squid, amphipods, mysid shrimp, limpets and small clams. One or more of these prey types may occur frequently in the samples, but very rarely in abundance, hence recorded metrics are limited to detailing the number of specimens observed and obtaining weights if warranted by the sample size. One exception concerns squid and octopus beaks, which like fish otoliths can be identified to species and the size and mass of individuals reconstituted based on regressions that use beak length to determine relational metrics. Like otoliths, beaks are also processed by experts outside PAL (see FISH), hence similar time lags exist in database integration. What role these less abundant prey items have in Adélie penguin diets is unknown, but paleoecological evidence suggests that squid in particular were once consumed much more frequently in the PAL region than they are now.\\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\n... (11 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinDietPreyOtherThanFishAndEuphausiaSuberba | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietLog.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietLog | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinDietLog.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinDietLog/ | Adelie penguin diet metadata, 1991, present. | Adelie penguin diet metadata, 1991 - present. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\n\\nAdélie penguin diet samples are obtained during the chick-rearing phase of the breeding season (January -February) using stomach lavage (water off-loading method). Five adult penguins are typically sampled every 5-7 days (weather permitting) during this period by capturing birds near their breeding colonies as they return from foraging in the evenings. Before lavaging, birds are weighed and measured to obtain an index of gender and condition, and are then released at the site where they were initially captured. Variability in adult condition within and between seasons provides an important index of foraging effort and other related metrics. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (Sample Date/Time, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nisland_name (Island)\ncolony_code (Colony)\n... (5 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinDietLog/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinDietLog.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinDietLog&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinDietLog | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinBandsSeen.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinBandsSeen | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinBandsSeen.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinBandsSeen/ | Adelie penguin flipper band resightings, 1991, 2006. | Adelie penguin flipper band resightings, 1991 - 2006. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\n Annually between 1991 and 1998, a subsample of 1000 Adélie penguin crèche-age chicks were flipper-banded on Humble Island as part of demographic studies to determine long-term survival and recruitment. This was achieved through resighting efforts in the years that followed the banding work through 2006 when the last banded bird was observed. The decision to end the banding studies is in concordance with other national and international efforts to limit this work due to evidence that flipper- banding penguins may affect survival. \\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nindex\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (Date GMT, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nisland_name (Island)\ncolony_code (Colony)\n... (5 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinBandsSeen/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinBandsSeen.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinBandsSeen&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinBandsSeen | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess/ | Adelie penguin reproductive success, 1991, present.\\t | Adelie penguin chick fledging weights, 1991 - present.\\t. The fundamental long-term objective of the seabird component of the Palmer LTER (PAL) has been to identify and understand the mechanistic processes that regulate the mean fitness (population growth rate) of regional penguin populations. Two hypotheses have guided this research, with one suggesting that population mean fitness is best explained by changes in regional krill biomass, and the other proposing that long-term changes in sea ice affects mean fitness by tipping the balance in favor of one species over another in accordance with species-specific evolved life history affinities to sea ice. Although these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, current evidence in the PAL region tends to favor the latter over the former. Since the inception of PAL, Adélie penguin populations have effectively collapsed, while those of gentoo and chinstrap penguins have increased dramatically, trends that are spatially and temporally coherent with decreasing regional sea ice duration. Adélie penguins are an ice-obligate polar species whose life history is intimately linked to the presence of sea ice, while chinstrap and gentoo penguins are ice-intolerant species whose life histories evolved in the sub-Antarctic, where sea ice is a less permanent feature of the marine ecosystem. In contrast, although krill constitute the most important component of the summer diets by mass of these three penguin species, changes in PAL krill abundances have exhibited no long-term trends, and thus fail to explain the divergent patterns in penguin populations evident in our time series. \\n\\nA sample of Adélie penguin nests from colonies on Humble Island is randomly selected annually and checked daily (or as ice and weather conditions permit) throughout the breeding season from the time adults arrive until the chick crèche phase of the reproductive cycle. Recorded data (the timing of egg laying, hatching and crèching) provide a measure of annual breeding chronology, and the number of chicks crèched, an estimate of reproductive success (chicks crèched/breeding pair).\\n\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\nisland_name (Island)\ncolony_code (Colony)\nsite_number\nnest_number\negg1_lay_date (Egg 1 Lay Date)\n... (10 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | AdeliePenguinReproductionSuccess | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/PenguinCountsAnnualTotals.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/PenguinCountsAnnualTotals | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/PenguinCountsAnnualTotals.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/PenguinCountsAnnualTotals/ | Annual counts of penguin breeding pairs near Palmer Station, Antarctica 1970, 2006. | Annual counts of penguin breeding pairs near Palmer Station, Antarctica 1970 - 2006. Penguin populations are in the vicinity of Palmer Station, Anvers Island, Antarctica. The Adelie penguin, (Pygoscelis adeliae), one of two true sea ice-obligate Antarctic penguins are in decline near Palmer. Two lower-latitude species (Chinstrap and Gentoo penguins) are now rapidly colonizing the region.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nyear (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nchinstrap_num_breeding_pairs\nadelie_num_breeding_pairs\ngentoo_num_breeding_pairs\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/PenguinCountsAnnualTotals/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/PenguinCountsAnnualTotals.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=PenguinCountsAnnualTotals&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | PenguinCountsAnnualTotals | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter/ | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993, 1999 and 2001. | The objectives of the LTER seabird component during the 92-93 season cruises were similar. These objectives included 1) determining the pelagic abundance and distribution of Adelie Penguins, 2) examining how the physical and biological characteristics of the marine environment influence these parameters and, 3) using these data to identify foraging areas that may be important to Adelie populations being studied as part of land-based work at Palmer Station. Secondary objectives included documenting the abundance and distribution of other seabirds and marine mammals within the LTER study area. The focus of the January cruise was the nearshore foraging habitat,which required sampling at smaller scales. All seabird censuses were thus conducted within approximately 100 kms of Palmer Station while traversing a sampling grid with stations at 10km intervals. The first two days (18-20 January) of this cruise were spent covering the selected grid as rapidly as possible resulting in 45 transects spaced at 45-60 minute intervals. There were no stops at the 10km stations during this Fast Grid phase. Upon completion of the Fast Grid, a force 12 gale suspended data collection for 24 hours. From January 22-25 the grid direction was reversed and the grid repeated. During this Slow Grid phase, 2-M net tows were done at 10km intervals and BOPS and 1-M and 2-M net tows every 20 km. All seabird censusesduring the cruise were done using the procedures outlined in theprevious paragraph.\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\nevent\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nlat_end (Latitude, degrees_north)\nlon_end (Longitude, degrees_east)\ndepth (m)\ncruise_name\nstart_station\nend_station\nduration (minutes)\n... (14 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter_fgdc.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter_iso19115.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/BirdCensusLogMovingWinter.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=BirdCensusLogMovingWinter&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | BirdCensusLogMovingWinter | ||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusStationaryWinter.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusStationaryWinter | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusStationaryWinter.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/BirdCensusStationaryWinter/ | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993, 1999 and 2001. | The objectives of the LTER seabird component during the 92-93 season cruises were similar. These objectives included 1) determining the pelagic abundance and distribution of Adelie Penguins, 2) examining how the physical and biological characteristics of the marine environment influence these parameters and, 3) using these data to identify foraging areas that may be important to Adelie populations being studied as part of land-based work at Palmer Station. Secondary objectives included documenting the abundance and distribution of other seabirds and marine mammals within the LTER study area. The focus of the January cruise was the nearshore foraging habitat,which required sampling at smaller scales. All seabird censuses were thus conducted within approximately 100 kms of Palmer Station while traversing a sampling grid with stations at 10km intervals. The first two days (18-20 January) of this cruise were spent covering the selected grid as rapidly as possible resulting in 45 transects spaced at 45-60 minute intervals. There were no stops at the 10km stations during this Fast Grid phase. Upon completion of the Fast Grid, a force 12 gale suspended data collection for 24 hours. From January 22-25 the grid direction was reversed and the grid repeated. During this Slow Grid phase, 2-M net tows were done at 10km intervals and BOPS and 1-M and 2-M net tows every 20 km. All seabird censusesduring the cruise were done using the procedures outlined in theprevious paragraph.\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\nevent\ncruise_id\nstudy_name (Study)\ndepth (m)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ntime (seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nstation\ngrid_line (km)\ngrid_station (km)\nsea_state\nsalinity (Sea Water Practical Salinity, 1)\n... (14 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/BirdCensusStationaryWinter_fgdc.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/BirdCensusStationaryWinter_iso19115.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/BirdCensusStationaryWinter/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/BirdCensusStationaryWinter.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=BirdCensusStationaryWinter&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | BirdCensusStationaryWinter | ||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusMovingSummer.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusMovingSummer | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusMovingSummer.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/BirdCensusMovingSummer/ | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993, 2018. | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993 - 2018. The objectives of the LTER seabird component during the 92-93 season cruises were similar. These objectives included 1) determining the pelagic abundance and distribution of Adelie Penguins, 2) examining how the physical and biological characteristics of the marine environment influence these parameters and, 3) using these data to identify foraging areas that may be important to Adelie populations being studied as part of land-based work at Palmer Station. Secondary objectives included documenting the abundance and distribution of other seabirds and marine mammals within the LTER study area. The focus of the January cruise was the nearshore foraging habitat,which required sampling at smaller scales. All seabird censuses were thus conducted within approximately 100 kms of Palmer Station while traversing a sampling grid with stations at 10km intervals. The first two days (18-20 January) of this cruise were spent covering the selected grid as rapidly as possible resulting in 45 transects spaced at 45-60 minute intervals. There were no stops at the 10km stations during this Fast Grid phase. Upon completion of the Fast Grid, a force 12 gale suspended data collection for 24 hours. From January 22-25 the grid direction was reversed and the grid repeated. During this Slow Grid phase, 2-M net tows were done at 10km intervals and BOPS and 1-M and 2-M net tows every 20 km. All seabird censuses during the cruise were done using the procedures outlined in the previous paragraph.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ncruise_id\nevent\nsample_minutes_from_start (minutes)\nspecies_code\nnumber_items (1)\nnum_linkages (1)\nbehavior\ndirection\nnotes\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/BirdCensusMovingSummer/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/BirdCensusMovingSummer.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=BirdCensusMovingSummer&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | BirdCensusMovingSummer | ||||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusStationarySummer.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusStationarySummer | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusStationarySummer.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/BirdCensusStationarySummer/ | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993, 2018. | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993 - 2018. The objectives of the LTER seabird component during the 92-93 season cruises were similar. These objectives included 1) determining the pelagic abundance and distribution of Adelie Penguins, 2) examining how the physical and biological characteristics of the marine environment influence these parameters and, 3) using these data to identify foraging areas that may be important to Adelie populations being studied as part of land-based work at Palmer Station. Secondary objectives included documenting the abundance and distribution of other seabirds and marine mammals within the LTER study area. The focus of the January cruise was the nearshore foraging habitat, which required sampling at smaller scales. All seabird censuses were thus conducted within approximately 100 kms of Palmer Station while traversing a sampling grid with stations at 10km intervals. The first two days (18-20 January) of this cruise were spent covering the selected grid as rapidly as possible resulting in 45 transects spaced at 45-60 minute intervals. There were no stops at the 10km stations during this Fast Grid phase. Upon completion of the Fast Grid, a force 12 gale suspended data collection for 24 hours. From January 22-25 the grid direction was reversed and the grid repeated. During this Slow Grid phase, 2-M net tows were done at 10km intervals and BOPS and 1-M and 2-M net tows every 20 km. All seabird censuses during the cruise were done using the procedures outlined in the previous paragraph.\\n\\nSeventy-two 30-minute transects and 15 station censuses were completed during the January cruise. Athough seabirds were widely distributed throughout the study area, the highest densities and greatest biomass occurred consistently within 2-5 km of Anvers Island and several major island groups to the south and \\nwest near the Antarctic Peninsula. Adelie Penguins were the dominant component of this seabird assemblage in terms of both abundance and biomass. South Polar Skuas ranked second and Black-browed Albatross third, with the latter becoming the dominant assemblage member at distances greater than 10km from land. Although \\nSouth Polar Skuas had been expected to occur in more pelagic habitats, few were censused at distances greater than 10km from land. The presence of both skuas and penguins so close to land was unexpected. The most important variable accounting for variation in the distribution and abundance of seabirds appeared to \\nbe the location of the 200m contour, which throughout the study area occurred 2-5km from the adjoining land masses. Approximately 65% of the seabirds censused during this cruise (85% of the biomass) occurred in association with this contour.\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\n... (25 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/BirdCensusStationarySummer_fgdc.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/BirdCensusStationarySummer_iso19115.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/BirdCensusStationarySummer/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/BirdCensusStationarySummer.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=BirdCensusStationarySummer&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | BirdCensusStationarySummer | ||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer/ | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993, present. | At-sea seabird censuses. Data on the species encountered (including marine mammals), their abundance, distribution and behavior. Data collected aboard cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Penninsula, 1993 - present. The objectives of the LTER seabird component during the 92-93 season cruises were similar. These objectives included 1) determining the pelagic abundance and distribution of Adelie Penguins, 2) examining how the physical and biological characteristics of the marine environment influence these parameters and, 3) using these data to identify foraging areas that may be important to Adelie populations being studied as part of land-based work at Palmer Station. Secondary objectives included documenting the abundance and distribution of other seabirds and marine mammals within the LTER study area. The focus of the January cruise was the nearshore foraging habitat,which required sampling at smaller scales. All seabird censuses were thus conducted within approximately 100 kms of Palmer Station while traversing a sampling grid with stations at 10km intervals. The first two days (18-20 January) of this cruise were spent covering the selected grid as rapidly as possible resulting in 45 transects spaced at 45-60 minute intervals. There were no stops at the 10km stations during this Fast Grid phase. Upon completion of the Fast Grid, a force 12 gale suspended data collection for 24 hours. From January 22-25 the grid direction was reversed and the grid repeated. During this Slow Grid phase, 2-M net tows were done at 10km intervals and BOPS and 1-M and 2-M net tows every 20 km. All seabird censusesduring the cruise were done using the procedures outlined in theprevious paragraph.\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\nstudy_name (Study)\ntime (Date/Time, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nlat_end (Latitude, degrees_north)\nlon_end (Longitude, degrees_east)\ndepth (m)\nevent\ncruise_id\nstart_station\n... (16 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer_fgdc.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer_iso19115.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/BirdCensusLogMovingSummer.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=BirdCensusLogMovingSummer&showErrors=false&email= | National Science Foundation | BirdCensusLogMovingSummer | ||
https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance.subset | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/tabledap/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance.graph | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/files/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance/ | Zooplankton collected with a 1.4 m2 frame, 500-µm mesh Multiple Opening/Closing Net and Environmental Sensing System (MOCNESS) aboard Palmer LTER annual cruises off the coast of the Western Antarctic Peninsula, 2009-2017 | Zooplankton are a morphologically and taxonomically diverse group of animals. Many zooplankton feed on phytoplankton in surface waters and thus provide a link between primary producers and higher trophic levels. Other zooplankton reside in the mesopelagic zone and feed on detritus or on other animals. Depth-discrete density of zooplankton taxa was determined at process study stations on the annual Palmer LTER cruises along the western Antarctic Peninsula. Samples were collected with a 1.4-m2 frame, 500-μm mesh Multiple Opening/Closing Net and Environmental Sensing System (MOCNESS) towed obliquely to the surface from a depth of typically 500 m. MOCNESS tows were conducted in consecutive day-night pairs at each process study station. Zooplankton depth distributions vary between day and night as these animals conduct diel vertical migrations. Depth distributions also vary among zooplankton taxa based on species feeding ecology and life history traits. Zooplankton diel vertical migration contributes to the export of carbon and nutrients from the surface ocean to the mesopelagic zone.\n\ncdm_data_type = Trajectory\nVARIABLES:\ntow_start_datetime (MOCNESS start datetime, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\ntow_end_datetime (MOCNESS end datetime, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nlatitude (Net Lat Avg, degrees_north)\nlongitude (Net Lon Avg, degrees_east)\ncruise_name\ngrid_line\ngrid_station\namphipoda\ncacutus\nchaetognatha\ncpropinquus\necrystal\ngymnosomata\nlhelicina\nmgerlachei\nostracoda\n... (28 more variables)\n | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance_fgdc.xml | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/info/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance/index.htmlTable | https://pal.lternet.edu/![]() | http://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/rss/CruiseZooplanktonAbundance.rss | https://pallter-data.marine.rutgers.edu/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=CruiseZooplanktonAbundance&showErrors=false&email= | Rutgers University | CruiseZooplanktonAbundance |